{"id":761,"date":"2022-09-06T11:42:13","date_gmt":"2022-09-06T11:42:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/notes-de-fin\/quavons-nous-fait-jusquici\/4-2-la-nouvelle-ideologie-du-deni\/"},"modified":"2022-11-03T23:51:42","modified_gmt":"2022-11-03T23:51:42","slug":"4-2-la-nouvelle-ideologie-du-deni","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/notes-de-fin\/quavons-nous-fait-jusquici\/4-2-la-nouvelle-ideologie-du-deni\/","title":{"rendered":"4.2 La nouvelle ide\u0301ologie du de\u0301ni"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"notes\">\n<p class=\"author\"><a href=\"\/contributors#kevin-anderson\" rel=\"author\">Kevin Anderson<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"date\">Toutes les sources num\u00e9riques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 consult\u00e9es le <time datetime=\"2022-02-28\">28 f\u00e9vrier 2022<\/time><\/p>\n<ol start=\"206\">\n<li>\n<p>\n<q>huit ans au vu des e\u0301missions actuelles<\/q> Groupe d\u2019experts intergouvernemental sur l\u2019\u00e9volution du climat, <cite><span class=\"book\">Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change<\/span><\/cite>, \u00e9d. V. Masson-Delmotte et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, \u00e0 venir), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/report\/ar6\/wg1\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/report\/ar6\/wg1\/<\/a>. Ce chiffre repose sur le budget carbone associ\u00e9 \u00e0 une probabilit\u00e9 de 67 % de rester en de\u00e7\u00e0 d\u20191,5 \u00b0C (voir tableau SPM.2), mis \u00e0 jour avec les derni\u00e8res donn\u00e9es disponibles en mati\u00e8re d\u2019\u00e9missions, soit les ann\u00e9es 2020 et 2021. Le budget est ensuite divis\u00e9 par les \u00e9missions mondiales actuelles de CO<sub>2<\/sub> pour 2021. Il en r\u00e9sulte moins de huit ann\u00e9es aux niveaux actuels d\u2019\u00e9missions.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<q>moins de vingt ans d\u2019e\u0301missions au rythme actuel<\/q> Ibid. Calcul\u00e9 \u00e0 partir de la probabilit\u00e9 de 83 % de rester en de\u00e7\u00e0 de 2 \u00b0C (conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019expression \u00ab bien en de\u00e7\u00e0 de 2 \u00b0C \u00bb) du tableau SPM.2.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<q>d\u2019ici a\u0300 2035 environ, il faudra par ailleurs avoir e\u0301limine\u0301 tout usage des e\u0301nergies fossiles<\/q> Anderson, K., et al., <cite>\u2018A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of \u2018climate progressive\u2019 nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways\u2019<\/cite>, <span class=\"book\">Climate Policy<\/span>, 20 (10), 2020: 1290\u20131304, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14693062.2020.1728209\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14693062.2020.1728209<\/a>. Le budget carbone \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle plan\u00e9taire (pour une probabilit\u00e9 de 67 % de rester en de\u00e7\u00e0 d\u20191,5 \u00b0C) est tir\u00e9 du rapport le plus r\u00e9cent du GIEC (rapport d\u2019\u00e9valuation n\u00b0 6). Le GIEC indique un budget carbone mondial de 400 milliards de tonnes de CO<sub>2<\/sub>, mais \u00e0 compter de 2020. Entre cette date et le d\u00e9but de 2022, 80 milliards de tonnes de CO<sub>2<\/sub> ont \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9mises (dans le monde), le solde est donc de 320 milliards de tonnes. Le sujet \u00e9tant ici les combustibles fossiles, une partie du budget restant sera n\u00e9cessairement affect\u00e9 aux \u00e9missions industrielles de proc\u00e9d\u00e9s (li\u00e9es principalement aux cimenteries) et \u00e0 toute \u00e9mission nette terrestre de CO<sub>2<\/sub>. Une interpr\u00e9tation tr\u00e8s optimiste de ces contraintes donne le chiffre de 60 milliards de tonnes, ce qui nous donne ainsi un budget carbone li\u00e9 aux combustibles fossiles d\u2019environ 260 milliards de tonnes. Cette m\u00e9thode est d\u00e9taill\u00e9e dans l\u2019article cit\u00e9 plus haut et intitul\u00e9 \u00ab A factor of two \u00bb.\n<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li value=\"208\">\n<p>\n<q>le 1 % le plus fortune\u0301 a un mode de vie qui engendre le double d\u2019e\u0301missions<\/q> Kartha, S., et al., <cite><span class=\"book\">The Carbon Inequality Era: An Assessment of the Global Distribution of Consumption Emissions among Individuals from 1990 to 2015 and Beyond<\/span><\/cite>, Stockholm Environment Institute et Oxfam, 21 septembre 2020, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21201\/2020.6492\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21201\/2020.6492<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<q>suffirait a\u0300 re\u0301duire les e\u0301missions mondiales d\u2019environ un tiers<\/q> GAtlas mondial du carbone, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalcarbonatlas.org\/en\/CO2-emissions\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.globalcarbonatlas.org\/en\/CO2-emissions<\/a>; Chancel, L., and Piketty, T., <cite><span class=\"book\">Carbon and Inequality: From Kyoto to Paris. Trends in the Global Inequality of Carbon Emissions (1998\u20132013) and Prospects for an Equitable Adaptation Fund<\/span><\/cite>, Paris School of Economics working paper, 3 novembre 2015, <a href=\"http:\/\/piketty.pse.ens.fr\/files\/ChancelPiketty2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/piketty.pse.ens.fr\/files\/ChancelPiketty2015.pdf<\/a>. C\u2019est un simple calcul r\u00e9alis\u00e9 \u00e0 partir des donn\u00e9es de l\u2019Atlas mondial du carbone et de l\u2019analyse qui figure dans le rapport de Chancel et Piketty.\n<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kevin Anderson Toutes les sources num\u00e9riques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 consult\u00e9es le 28 f\u00e9vrier 2022 huit ans au vu des e\u0301missions actuelles Groupe d\u2019experts intergouvernemental sur l\u2019\u00e9volution du climat, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, \u00e9d. V. Masson-Delmotte et&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"parent":759,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-essay.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-761","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/761\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/759"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theclimatebook.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}